Freud vs. Jung Essay Example for Free

Freud vs. Jung EssaySigmund Freud and Carl Jung similarities and differences in pipe day-dream analysis Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung atomic number 18 cardinal renowned psychoanalysts who contri scarceed great take on to the interlingual rendition of dreams. Carl Jung began as a student of Sigmund Freud, but upon their first interactions he had doubts around the basis of Freuds work stemming from a purely sexual nature and leading to his sexual (McGowan, 1994). Jung was greatly influenced by Freuds dream work involving the resistance of exposition of dreams, and used this basis of cognition to help create his own possible action regarding dream interpretation. Freud and Jungs dream interpretations took different approaches as to the underlying cause of dream or the intended purpose of the dream finality and the collective unconscious mind(p) versus causality and they in like manner used any acquired information in the interpretation differently. Freuds dream analysis a nd interpretation focused gravely on wish-fulfillment and Jungs interpretation focused on searching for solutions from within the dream. Although their dream interpretations vary, they did sh atomic number 18 two major similarities in their work the value and benefits of dream interpretation in therapy and the importance of the patient-therapist family relationship.?Freud placed sexuality at the core of human beings and made use of the human eros to make out the format of conversation where we would reach out beyond and attempt to change even the most fixed structures of our psyche, because even though we have our own ship focusing of changing in response to certain conversations, we tend to view the world in a relatively constant sense. He called this conversation psychoanalytic (Lear, 2005). Freud believed that dreams show beyond their superficial heart and soul to reveal sources of desire deep within the dreamer.He attempted to formulate a systematic method of uncovering c abalistic dream upings of dreams which not only en adequate to(p)s us to understand them but to do something about them (Lear, 2005). In revisal to completely understand the meaning of a dream it is prerequisite to understand the manifest and latent content of the dream and how that content is related in regards to the dreamer. The manifest content is what the dreamer remembers upon waking up and is the surface meaning of the dream. Freud also regards the manifest content as an answer on internal stimuli.The latent content of the dream is the hidden meaning of the dream (Lear, 2005). Dream-work is the execute by which the dream is put together and if the understanding of a dream is going to potentially be therapeutic then it cannot be just a hypothetical understanding of how the dream was constructed. It must be a practical understanding of the dream as it extends itself into the waking manner (Lear, 2005). Freud also introduced the concept of dream security review which refe rs to a process of disguise and distortion of things within the dream that are viewed as painful or otherwise seen unacceptable to the dreamer.Resistance arises due to the dreamers censorship which preserves the deformed dreams even once the dreamer wakes up. Resistance also occurs when a dreamer has parts missing or they cannot or will not remember certain parts of their dream. This resistance is a sign that a conflict is present and wants to be expressed. Freud also believed that dreams are a way to obtain wish fulfillment, usually that of suppressed sexual wishes. These wishes are internal stimuli that become a visual hallucinatory fulfillment within the dream. The dream activity is not just an expression of a wish, but it is also gratification (Lear, 2005).Freud used three principles when interpreting dreams. The first principle states that the dream interpretation must take the context of the dreamers life into account which includes consideration of the content of the dream, c haracteristic and circumstances of the dreamer and how the content fits into the overall life of the dreamer (Lear, 2005). The second principle states that the dream interpretation must be holistic which means that analyses of individual parts of the dream must be construe as they relate to the dream as a whole.For example, dreaming of something as specific as falling, going bald, etc. will not always mean the same thing because they are not fixed symbols and individual meaning will greatly depend on the dreamer (Lear, 2005). Finally, the third principle states that the net authority of the meaning of a dream is the dreamer. The meaning of the dream should be given by the dreamer and the process of discovering the meaning should only be facilitated so the dreamer is able to determine the meaning of the dream for their self (Lear, 2005).These three principles display the notion that Freud was not only concerned with the interpretation of dreams, but the self-interpretation by the d reamer. The dreamer must say what their dream meant and do so by explaining how the dream fits into their lives as a whole and why it matters (Lear, 2005). Jung called the relationship between the unconscious and conscious the collective unconscious. He believed that the role of the unconscious is to act compensatorily to the conscious contents of the moment.The conscious acts rationally and its compensated by an irrational unconscious, but the rational attitude is not natural for the mind. If the mind is forced for too long to act rationally, it eventually gives way and the unconscious contents are able to get back into the conscious. There are two types of contents in the unconscious personal unconscious contents which include painful thoughts, unpleasant memories and hateful personality traits of which a person prefers not to remember. Jung viewed these problems of the personal unconscious as a distraction from the true conflict.The second type of unconscious is the collective u nconscious which contains all of the legends and myths of human kind as well as the inherited and ominous. Dreams and fantasies are filled with primary propensities of forms of thought and feeling and everything about which men are universally agreed or which is universally understood, said, or done (McGowan, 1994). Dreams present messages of symbols and warnings from the collective unconscious attempting to reach consciousness. Jung believed that dreams reflect the dreamers life berth until the dreamer decides to become concerned with it.According to Jung, the initial dream which occurs the night before therapy is thought to have significance because the act of attending therapy can gain a strong impulse for the appearance of the dreamers conflict and can even bear solutions for the conflict, possible obstacles, and even a final result. He placed special importance on the repetition of certain dreams, especially those in which the dreamer deals with the same conflict but from di fferent perspectives. The sequence of events in the dream is also important in understanding the meaning of the dream.Jung developed a theory on the structure of dreams and most importantly is the end of the dream because the dreamer is unable to consciously influence the outcome or change the end of the dream and thus reflect real situations. Jung believed in two kinds of dreams which were sort based on the information presented initially by the dreamer favorable which offered the best solutions to solving conflicts and unfavorable which were viewed as a warning sign (McGowan, 1994). twain Freud and Jung believed that there was value in discussing and determining the role of dreams in therapy.Jung believed that dreams illustrated a specific problem of the dreamer and also solutions to resolve the problem. They both agreed that dreams are a way of expressing a conflict for the dreamer. Freud believed that the manifest content of the dream was a way to answer the desire of the inte rnal stimulus and Jung believed that dreams warn dreamers about internal processes that may be neglected during conscious thought. The analysts purpose is to help the dreamer find the internal conflict that led to the musing of the dream, as well as to help the dreamer aware of the conflict and recognize any significance to their life.Freud and Jung agreed that there is significance in the patient-therapist relationship and therefore the impact on the interpretation of dreams. They agreed that in order for a dream interpretation to take place the dreamer but provide their full cooperation, actively participate, and hold nothing back (Lear, 2005). Although Jung was a student of Freud, he influenced Freuds dream analysis based on his associations experiment. Jung proved that a dreamers associations which are any ideas that the dreamer thinks of when describing certain parts of the dream are essential to understanding the underlying content of the dream.In order to correctly interpret a dream Jung believed the analyst must know the dreamers current situation in life and Freud believed it was necessary to treasure the dreamers psychological background. Although, they may have used different words to describe essentially the same thing, they agreed that once the analyst has stubborn a potential meaning for the dream they must also determine its relativity and connectedness to the dreamers life.Ultimately, Freud and Jung believed that there was significance to the interpretation of dreams in therapy due to the belief that dreams are a representation of conflicts and also the importance of evaluating a dreamers associations to determine the underlying meaning of the dream (Lear, 2005). duration Freud and Jung had similarities in their dream analysis, they too had many differences. Freuds interpretation of dreams focused on what the underlying cause of the dream was and that dreams are a representative way of acting on internal stimuli which represented unsatisfie d wishes (Lear, 2005).Jung was not concerned with the causality of dreams but the purpose of dreams and their intended effects on the dreamer. He interpreted dreams based on his belief in the second type of unconscious content the collective unconscious which stated that all dreams essentially have key meanings or certain characteristics for common reactions to situations. For example, someone who lost someone close to them who displays their grief openly has a fundamental meaning that causes others to express pity for them.Jung also believed that dreams presented a parallel to the conscious in that it is nearly impossible to think of anything else when dealing with a conflict and searching for a solution and that dreams allow this process to continue automatically (McGowan, 1994). Another major difference between Freud and Jung was how they used information gathered during the interpretation of dreams. Freud viewed dreams in the sense that they represented a conflict, or suppresse d unsatisfied wish that needed to be answered whereas Jungs focus was on searching for solutions to conflicts that were already expressed within the dream.Despite their differences in theory and interpretation of certain aspects of dreams, both Freud and Jung were able to make great strides in their works with dream analysts and leave behind invaluable information for other psychoanalysts to father and develop from. Their continual placement of high importance on the patient-therapist relationship and the value of dreams in therapy have continued to be of importance to those who have examine their methods.Their differences in approach to determining the cause and or purpose of the dream and the acquisition of information interpretation layed the foundation for other psychoanalysts to explore, expand, and dispute their theories, thus furthering the APAs body of knowledge regarding dream analyst. References Lear, J. (2005). Freud. (pp. 18-19, 90-115). New York City, NY Routledge Pub lishers. McGowan, D. (1994). What is wrong with Jung. Buffalo, New York Prometheus Books.