Juries are fundamental to our adversarial criminal justice process and Essay

Juries are fundamental to our adversarial criminal justice process and the only real guarantee of lividity between the State (as prosecutor) and the Individual - Essay ExampleIn the case of a trial by jury, a decision is rendered by a sort out of nine individuals who may be drawn from different backgrounds, thereby bringing a depth of understanding of problems that single judges may not possess. harmonise to Janata, it is the mix of different persons with different backgrounds and psychological traits in the jury room that produces the desired results. (Janata, 1976 595-596). This feature may imbue juries with a greater ability to do it and make accurate determinations about the credibility of witnesses and the validity of arguments being offered, peculiarly in criminal trials, especially because a jury is able to evaluate witnesses, plaintiffs and defendants from their scene as ordinary citizens. Judges may sometimes get mired in the legal formalities and procedures to such an extent it may impede their visceral judgments.There is also a greater possibility of bend arising when a single judge makes a decision on a case, particularly when it is a criminal case. In the case of a jury trial, the decision rendered is the cumulative effect of group deliberation, after the input and reflections from the different members comprising the jury are assimilated. Hence, a jury has the advantage of collective recall and weighing up of factors impacting upon a case. Since each fact is explored and discussed in a group, it allows a group scrutiny where bias is more likely to be eliminated than in the case of a single Judge. Jury trials have been advocated as an effective measure to bring justice to citizens, especially in criminal trials where jurors are believed to be better able to make assessments and judgments about character and believability of witnesses.Gastill and Weiser (2006) argue in favor of jury trials on the basis that being a part of a jury can spur gre ater levels of civil engagement from juror citizens and thereby provide a spur for real, deliberative democracy. While jurors do not make policy decisions, the